Michael Wood challenges the idea of a clear divide between pre- and post-theory worlds in literary criticism, suggesting that theory remains relevant. He explores how literary critics like William Empson resist easy categorization within this framework. Wood delves into Empson’s emphasis on language’s nuances, contradictions, and metaphors, showing how it transcends traditional critical labels.
Wood not only delves into Empson’s contribution to literary theory but also examines his exploration of Eastern influences from his time in Japan and China. Empson’s unique blend of Buddhist concepts with Christian theology offers a fresh perspective that transcends Eurocentrism.
By tracing Empson’s journey from language philosophy to theology, Wood highlights how Empson’s approach aligns with structuralism and deconstruction. Wood’s detailed analysis of Empson’s poems and references showcases his critical acumen without overshadowing formal analysis.
Empson’s focus on poetry, belief, and his encounter with Eastern philosophies, particularly Buddhism, offers a nuanced understanding of ambiguity and dualities in his work. Wood draws parallels between Empson’s interpretations of Eastern and Western religious ideologies, emphasizing a dialectic that bridges cultural divides.
Wood connects Empson’s fascination with wordplay to Wittgenstein’s philosophy, underscoring the open-ended nature of interpretation. Both Wood and Empson invite readers to explore diverse meanings and interpretations, guiding them through literary crossroads and offering multiple paths for further exploration.
